Science?
These huge sandstone stones are situated not very far from here.
They’re said to have been a place of worship in Celtic times already. Every year, at times like Midsummer, Samhein and whatnot, hippie heathens go there to party.
They’ve definitely been used by the church, which soon becomes obvious when you approach one of the main stones - a huge biblical scene has been hewn into the poor innocent rock.
I don’t know if the picture can bring that across (especially as it’s in such poor quality, but it’s a photo that has been scanned by an ailing scanner…), but if you just stand there and look at them, it’s like… wow. They’re awe-inspiring.
You can vividly imagine those Celtic “heathens” climbing up them and feeling grand, just like you yourself are doing, standing there.
Sceptics always said that that was more wishful thinking than proven fact.
And during the last month the media announced them to be right. (The sceptics, not the starry-eyed neo-Celts.)
I read an article in our local newspaper which announced the scientifically proven fact that the caves in the stones have not been used before the Middle Ages. It then went on to explain the scientific method the scientists who spent 1.5 years doing their stuff there had used. But let’s skip that for a moment.
As I don’t have the newspaper anymore I dug up a Spiegel article on the web.
Basically it said the same thing, only in more detail.
Two fire marks in the caves are said to have been made in 1325 and 1425 AD.
The marks in the grotto are decidedly older and are estimated to be from 735 and 934 AD. Even with the given margin for error this would mean that the earliest mark cannot have been made any earlier than 555 AD.
Then the article goes on to explain the scientific method used.
Apparently it is possible to date the time when the quartz and feldspar grains within the sandstone have been heated the last time.
See anything green? I sure did right in that Glocke article. The Spiegel people were at least honest (clever?) enough to mention the obvious flaw of this method.
It’s failsafe against smaller fires (as it is a known fact that people have been lighting fires in the caves and the grotto until the 1960’s), but it will only tell you the time of the last really big fire.
The caves could in theory have been in use for 10,000 years, and the method would only show those latest fires.
Yes, I admit I want to believe.
But as long as science does not provide any real proof I dare say that is my right.

November 11th, 2005 at 10:57 pm
People seek out to prove what they believe is right to prove other people wrong….
It all just depends on what you believe
November 12th, 2005 at 3:50 am
Teh kik has spoken.
November 12th, 2005 at 7:50 am
Has he?
November 13th, 2005 at 9:48 am
Maaaah! No, he told me that he needs to ask you first!
hey, check mine if you want:
caesarali2000@yahoo.com
hey, I did visit Deutschland when I was kid with my family, we used to live in Munich for 3 months.
I had a pic with my parents there infront of BMW’s co. (I was baby though).
November 13th, 2005 at 11:12 am
Aw, isn’t he sweet?
Eeps, Bavaria!!!!!